Why are police departments still using the Crown Victoria?
As the Hollywood Police Department and local media probe to find out what caused a Hollywood squad car to engulf in flames, killing an officer Saturday night, it’s surprising that more emphasis has not been placed on the make of the squad car Alex Del Rio was driving that night; the Crown Victoria.
In fact, the first question that popped in my mind after I heard the news was whether or not the officer was driving a Crown Victoria, one of the most widely used models for squad cars in police departments throughout the country.
And one of the most dangerous cars ever introduced in this country, prone to fires and explosions after rear-end collisions.
THE FACELESS MAN II
Photo by The Associated Press |
When I was a police reporter in Phoenix for The Arizona Republic, one of the biggest stories we ever worked on was the story of Jason Schechterle, pictured right, a Phoenix police officer who survived one such explosion but suffered fourth-degree burns in the process in 2001, forever altering his appearance and life.
A year later, it was another Phoenix-area police officer involved in a Crown Victoria fire after his squad car was struck from behind. But this time, the incident killed Chandler Police Officer Robert Nielson.
And in 1998, it was Arizona State Trooper Juan Cruz who was killed after his Crown Victoria ended up engulfed in flames.
At least 21 officers throughout the country have been killed in such incidents since the Ford Motor Company introduced the Crown Victoria in 1978, according to this timeline, including two South Florida officers in 1997.
The problem lies in the design of the vehicle. Unlike most cars, the gas tank is not protected by the rear axle, so in a high impact rear collision, the gas tank ruptures. The gas then comes in contact with sparks created by the impact, which then causes the car to engulf in flames within seconds.
According to Wikipedia, the Ford Motor Company finally addressed the issue in 2005:
Following the criticism of fires following rear-end collisions, 2005 and later model Police Interceptors now come with an optional automatic fire suppression system and special “trunk packs” designed to help prevent trunk contents from piercing the fuel tank in a collision. Each agency must pay an additional $150 for the trunk packs. For a more detailed discussion of the fuel tank leakage concerns that prompted these changes, see Ford Crown Victoria.
Del Rio was driving a 2005 Crown Victoria which supposedly had this shield, according to Local 10.
However, Texas deputy Bill Wilson’s Crown Victoria was also equipped with this shield, but his car engulfed in flames anyway when it was struck from behind, severely burning the deputy in 2005.
And in 2006, this shield did not prevent two Ohio highway patrol troopers and a civilian from dying in a fiery collision when the civilian’s pickup rammed into the troopers’ Crown Victoria.
So shield or no shield, the real question is, why are police departments still using the Crown Victoria?
Can you fix the focus on a blurry photo after the fact?
The birth of Mirrorless Cameras
Choosing your first dSLR camera
New York City can be beautiful!
The Fujifilm Finepix X10, A Review
Choosing the Right Light Stand
Photojojo iPhone Telephoto Lens review — AudioCast
My week with Q
How To Become A Successful Photographer
"When the Wind Stopped" — poem with 4 photos
Tips for Textures
Butterflies in Motion
Cast aways - saving those photographic memories
One Man Show: My 25 Years With Digital Photography
Studio, Flash, & Available Light — Three Books Reviewed
Portrait styling: dangerous pairings
Adobe Photoshop CS6 Product Managers Interview Audiocast
A gift of flowers: unfold your senses
On Set of "Love & Robots" the Film
Ilford Galerie Gold Fibre Silk Inkjet Paper — Audiocast











Planning “National Geographic” style photo travel
Wilderness Travel 1 Rainforests – Essential Gear
Backlighting Basics
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 3 of 3
A Brief History Of Light & Photography: Part 2 Of 3
What Moves You?
FIGURES IN MOTION: Decades of Evolving Personal Imagery in Photography, Part 7
Lomography Store, Austin, Texas — GALLERY
GALLERY — Up to $1,000 Reward for Cattle Rustlers
Taking your Portraiture Higher
The "Bible" of Time-Lapse Photography
Interview with Harold Davis — Closeup Maestro of Flowers & Water Drops
Interview with Steve Caplin — Photoshop Digital Artist, Commercial Illustrator, & Author
Easy technique to select, edit and sequence keywords for web
How much should you charge for a photograph?
























Comments
I saw Jason Schechterle last night on The First 48. He’s in homicide now.
Good timing with this article.
http://www.geekologie.com/2008/11/new_cop_car_designed_for_cops.php
Easy reason. Space.
The car is the patrol officer’s rolling office.
There is even a thriving business out there that refurbishes old Crown vics for police re-use
Sounds like the old Ford Pinto. Of course someone had the sense to recall that, but you think that the car companies would have learned their lesson.
Well, many departments are using the Dodge Chargers now, but it’s true that the Crown Vic is one of the last big sedans out there.
Another reason is that new cars are purchased with taxpayer monies. As long as the typical American continues to throw a conniption fit any time raising taxes is mentioned, replacing these things with the Chargers or something somewhat comparable, like Impalas, is going to take forever.
Lastly, the Ford fix was supposed to correct the problem.
Helluva picture, by the way.
That is a great picture.
It sure beats the typical “have the subject hold the framed photo in its hands” photo.
Rick,
I guess the real question would be, why does Ford insist on producing these models?
Why not just discontinue the model altogether and design one with the gas tank protected by the rear axle, like thousands of other models?
They’ve already dished out millions in settlement fees, so it’s really stupid to continue producing them, even with the “shield”, which obviously hasn’t made a difference.
And some wonder why American car companies are needing to be bailed out.
I think you mean “third degree burns”, first degree burns are characterized by a slight reddening of the skin, ie, the least severe burn.
Michael,
You’re right. I should have actually said fourth-degree burns, which is what it was when I just double-checked.
It’s corrected. Thanks for the heads up.
Edwin
That looks like a cool car and hopefully they’ll start using them.
Here is the company website.
http://carbonmotors.com/
Scott,
Growing up in the 70s, the Pinto was the only car my parents ever drove. Until they switched to buying Japanese cars in the early 80s.
Hey I don’t have anything against the Pinto. I want one myself, I even have the fuzzy dice for the mirror. But you would think that by the turn of the century they wouldn’t have exploding cars anymore.
I also totally agree with Rick. Tax raises aren’t going to kill anybody, and it could save many lives, just by trading in some of these old models.
I wasn’t defending the Pintos. Far from it. Just stating the facts.
You would think Ford would have learned its lesson but obviously it hasn’t. I personally hope they go bankrupt and never see another business day.
Here is what Wikipedia said about the Pinto:
Ford was aware of this design flaw but allegedly refused to pay what was characterized as the minimal expense of a redesign. Instead, it was argued, Ford decided it would be cheaper to pay off possible lawsuits for resulting deaths. Mother Jones magazine obtained the cost-benefit analysis that it said Ford had used to compare the cost of an $11 ($57 today, allowing for inflation) repair against the cost of paying off potential law suits, in what became known as the Ford Pinto memo.
21 incidents in 30 years isn’t that bad, Carlos. Yes it sucks that sometimes they catch on fire. But i have friends that are police that have had the cars catch on fire from going 120MPH, too.
If you can find statistics on a car that has as much space, comfort, and handling capability as a Crown Victoria for about the same price (IE not a lincoln, or a mercury grand marquis) that has, and had as many on the road in continuous use as the crown vic, that had less “vehicle caused deaths” — i’d love to hear about it.
The Chevy Caprice was the old standby, but GM decided to stop making luxury sedans. Oh well.
Every time i see a police vehicle that isn’t a crown vic (especially those dodges); i can tell they’re not going to last.
And to answer “why does ford still make them” – that’s simple… Because the police use them.
and RE: wikipedia article about ford pinto… Fight Club’s main character is one of those cost analysis guys.
Still not much in the local media about this. They are probably afraid of Ford.
Thanks for having the guts to speak the truth!
Would be 1000 times more effecient if they used a base engine and chassis and built them up custom for divisions needs
I see why they want American, too bad they couldn’t beef up v6 accords cause they last forever and are just as fast almost stock, but would
Save gas and
Be just as safe, although would cost more to fix from accidents.
Would be cool to see a late 80′s chevy celebrity with a supercharger scoop, roll cage awd and bolted on Bumper crap like in mad max
Muhahaha
I cant understand the peoples frustration when an officer gets hurt in these type of incidents but this is just an article to bash an American car. 21 similar incidents in 30 years with thousands of the same cars used every day? Come on. when a Crown Vic or any other type of car is on the side of the highway and gets hit by a car traveling that fast, no car is going to withstand that kind of hit very well. A fire just may happen? Anyway These big 5000 pound cars will do better than any other car out their. Crown Victoria’s are one of the best quality cars every built. They can go well of 200k miles on original motors and transmissions. After they are cop cars they then become taxi cabs and then are beat into the ground for years. You will see crown vics as taxi cabs that are well over 15 years old. Anyway, This article does point out some terrible incidents but your overall argument is weak.
Aside from the obvious facts stated previously about vehicle use to tragedy ratio there are other good reasons to use a crown vic. No one else makes one. The chargers are a high maintenance car with little interior space and horrible blind spots among their many faults. Impalas don't hold up to abuse well at all. And with Ford talking about discontinuing the crown vic law enforcement officials in my state are wordering what to do other than buy suv's- and oh boy what an expense that is. I'm a mechanic. I've seen all of these vehicles up close and in the field. We'll miss crown victorias when they're gone.
Oh, and rear axles do NOT protect gas tanks. Rear axles shred gas tanks into tiny pieces just like a baseball bat with nails through it.
They should replace the gas tank with a type used in racing. Not only would it not gush out, it would also prevent sloshing during maneuvers.
Post new comment