Why is the media ignoring this story?

nickmorgan1

Photo by Bill Perry/Vietnam veteran


While the media has been busy chasing Joe the Plumber, it has ignored Nick Morgan, a 24-year-old veteran from the Iraq war who was trampled by police horses outside the presidential debate Wednesday night.

Morgan was among at least 14 members of Iraq Veterans Against the War who were trying to get into the debate to ask the candidates where they stood on veterans issues. They’ve been trying to meet the candidates since the conventions with no luck.

On Wednesday, mounted police officers on horseback forced the protesters back, knocking several to the ground, including Morgan, who was rushed to the hospital with a broken cheekbone.

However, one witness told Newsday - the only mainstream newspaper that appears to be covering this incident – that Morgan was already standing on the sidewalk, which is where police ordered the protesters to stand.

A witness who also was arrested, Kristofer Goldsmith of North Bellmore, said Morgan had obeyed a police order to return to the sidewalk when he was trampled.

“Stampeding a horse onto the sidewalk . . . is disturbing,” said Goldsmith, a member of Iraq Veterans Against the War. “The order was to stand on the sidewalk and that’s where my friend got hurt.”

According to IVAW, the veteran activist group had sent a message to debate moderator Bob Schieffer requesting permission to present their questions to the candidates during the debate, but their message was ignored.

One hour before the final presidential debate of the 2008 campaign, fourteen members of IVAW marched in formation to Hofstra University to present questions for the candidates. IVAW had requested permission from debate moderator Bob Schieffer to ask their questions during the debate but got no response.

The contingent of veterans in dress uniforms and combat uniforms attempted to enter the building where the debate was to be held in order to ask their questions but were turned back by police. The IVAW members at the front of the formation were immediately arrested, and others were pushed back into the crowd by police on horseback. Several members were injured, including former Army Sergeant Nick Morgan who suffered a broken cheekbone when he was trampled by police horses before being arrested.

The veterans were among several other groups of protesters, including Code Pink, who were standing outside the debates, but they appear to be the only protesters arrested, which is an extremely newsworthy item.

However, the only news organizations reporting on this story besides Newsday are independent media Websites, including Democracy Now and OpEdNews.

It was no different last month when IVAW member Adam Kokesh had sneaked into the Republican National Convention to hold up a sign stating that “McCain Votes Against Vets”, only to get kicked out.

Whether you agree with IVAW methods or not, we should expect, encourage and demand that our candidates give these veterans the courtesy to address their concerns and questions. After all, these veterans were shipped to Iraq to fight an illegal war, which most politicians supported at the time, even though they now admit it was a mistake.

McCain and Obama should have welcomed the group with open arms and perhaps even used some of them as props during the debate.

Instead of Joe the Plumber, we could have had Nick the Wounded Soldier explaining how he will now have to struggle with healthcare because cutbacks to veteran services has put them on the back burner. Especially considering that his fractured cheekbone was not received on the battlefield.

But all they did was kick him in the face with a horse for demonstrating his First Amendment rights.

And that’s worse than spitting on a veteran.

Comments

Anonymous
Anonymous

Don’t be so quick to blame this on Obama and McCain. They probably didn’t know about it and still don’t know about it. Blame the police chief who gave orders like that.

Anonymous
Anonymous

@Scott – I’m not really sure how you concluded any blame on the politicians debating from this.. perhaps you could explain?

The article itself is a little disturbing but I can’t say I’m surprised. The veterans have let their voices be heard on the streets and the Internet and I think anyone who has bothered listening to what they have to say is tired of today’s propaganda being fed through mediums such as television, radio.

Why has the media not picked up on this story? Perhaps because these stories are getting old for the masses craving entertainment. Nobody wants to hear that their country has been hijacked, right?

Anonymous
Anonymous

I shall explain. What I meant is that I do not believe that Obama and McCain ordered that protesters be trampled over with horses. Well… Maybe McCain, but certainly not Obama. The politicians don’t control the police, the police chief and mayor do. So if you want to blame someone, it’s probably more useful to blame the people who probably instigated it. Now if the secret service people who are protecting the candidates did it, then I might blame them.

Anonymous
Anonymous

I’m not blaming the candidates but I’m blaming the media for not reporting the incident.

I’m not even blaming the cops because they did what was expected of them.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Perhaps there’s no real story here — or at least nothing worth sensationalizing. We have a known protest group accosting a police force tasked with protecting the debate (and men whom are both sitting Senators and one who will become President in January) and the guys went too far. If anything — and objective reporting has gone out the window anymore — this story would damage the credibility of the protest movement weeks before the election. Shame on the MSM for not reporting it, but it’s no real surprise… I believe in your fight against repression of photography in public places and those who seek to subvert an inalienable right under the guise of “security,” propriety, or property but this one just seems like there’s little to be outraged about. Horses aren’t batons… they’re not tanks… in this case it seems a bit of a sensational stretch to assume they were used as weapons. Barricades (and prone to panic or erratic behavior, despite training), maybe… but weapons, no. The protester wound up on the wrong end of a physics story problem and paid with his face. It sucks he got hurt doing what he thought was right, but as a former soldier he should have understood they became the aggressors and forced the local PD to engage them, not the other way around. Just another view on the story…

Anonymous
Anonymous

I don’t see how they became the aggressors at all. Peacefull protesting whether condoned by the local police force or not, is not being aggressive. It’s also not the local police forces job to protect the cantidates. That would be the job of the Secret Service starting 120 days from election day. You also say that horses aren’t batons. Your right, they’re worse. Have you ever wondered why throughout history cavelry has been used against foot soldiers? It’s not because the warriors sit higher on the horses. It’s because you can just trample the enemy underfoot. Horses are very dangerous, (don’t get me wrong, I like horses), but they can most certainly be used as a weapon.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Carlos,

there are wars and genocide going on in our world and all we’ve heard about for the past 6 months is McCain/Obama. While this guy was clearly hurt and I feel for him, why are you so surprised that we haven’t heard about it?

Post new comment

Pixiq on Facebook

Join the 8108 Pixiq fans on Facebook

Share

  • Share

Subscribe

Get weekly updates from Pixiq. Short, sweet, and always interesting.